http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/01/johnny-weir-im-sexually-gay-but.html
This disturbs me.
This man is gay. He is not sexually attracted to women, but still believes he is entitled to marry one because... why, exactly? She can look after the house and children, maybe, but women hate sex anyway, so the fact that they don't have a sex life should just be fine and dandy, should it?
After all, women exist to be owned by men (even gay men, apparently!), regardless of whether those men have any interest in them beyond their domestic capacities, right?
Look, guys... if you want a maid, hire one. If you want kids, you'll be relieved to know that you don't have to knock up a woman to make it happen. There's always adoption, or surrogacy. If you want a nanny, there are plenty of people out there willing to do that job, too, for proper compensation.
A wife does not exist to be your unpaid servant, even if you're not having sex with her. Sorry, Johnny.
No comments:
Post a Comment